×
Sep 5, 2022 · I suspect the reason that the source file(s) of cpptest say "GNU Lesser General Public License" but still "version 2" is probably because it was ...
People also ask
Mar 16, 2020 · TL;DR: Is it legal to use a modified version of the product licensed under LGPL 2.1, for commercial purposes and without the permission of the ...
Missing: 13191/ ran- w
51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing ...
Missing: opensource. stackexchange. 13191/ w
Oct 15, 2021 · Ran into "GNU Lesser General Public License version 2" in a copyright notice - what license is this? LGPL 2? LGPL 2.1? Or...? 3.
Missing: 13191/ w
Ran into "GNU Lesser General Public License version 2" in a copyright notice - what license is this? LGPL 2? LGPL 2.1? Or...? Long story short, I'm working ...
Missing: 13191/ w
Aug 10, 2019 · The LGPLv2 is a standalone license. You are not required to include the GPLv2 as well. That might even be confusing if someone contributes ...
Missing: 13191/ ran- copyright- notice- w
GNU General Public License v2.0 ; Permissions. Commercial use. Modification. Distribution ; Limitations. Liability ; Conditions. License and copyright notice.
Missing: stackexchange. 13191/
I'm interested in how open game licenses have affected the companies issuing them commercially. For the purposes of this thread, benefits to gamers or those ...
As a special service "Fossies" has tried to format the requested text file into HTML format (style: standard) with prefixed line numbers. Alternatively you can ...
Missing: ran- | Show results with:ran-
I'm working on a private project and considering integrating a library that is licensed under the GPL 3.0 (GNU General Public License version 3.0). However, my ...
Missing: 13191/ w